Why automate workpapers with MyWorkpapers?
Common pain points associated with the lack of automation in the accounting & audit sector.
The lack of automation in accounting and audit workpapers is a significant bottleneck for UK firms, especially as the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and HMRC increase their demands for data integrity and real-time reporting.
In the current 2026 landscape, manual processes are no longer just “inefficient”—they are becoming a high-risk liability. Below is an expansion of the core pain points associated with manual workpapers in the UK.
1. The “Talent Drain” & Staff Burnout
The UK accounting sector is facing a chronic talent shortage. Manual workpapers exacerbate this by forcing highly qualified trainees and seniors into “ticking and bashing” exercises.
- The Pain: Junior staff spend up to 40% of their time on low-value data entry and manual reconciliations. This leads to rapid burnout and high attrition rates, as Gen Z and Millennial professionals expect modern, tech-enabled workflows.
- Impact: Firms lose their best talent to “Big 4” competitors who have automated these workflows, or to industry roles where the work-life balance is better.
2. Regulatory Risk & ISA (UK) 315 Compliance
The revised ISA (UK) 315 has significantly raised the bar for risk assessment. Auditors are now required to perform much more rigorous “understanding of the entity’s IT environment.”
- The Pain: Manual workpapers often fail to provide the structured “risk-to-procedure” mapping required by the FRC. Without automation, documenting the flow of transactions and identifying IT-related risks is inconsistent and prone to being “brushed over.”
- Impact: Poorly documented risk assessments are a primary reason for Tier 2 and Tier 3 firms receiving “Significant Improvement Required” ratings in FRC Audit Quality Reviews (AQR).
3. The “MTD ITSA” Compliance Burden
With Making Tax Digital for Income Tax Self Assessment (MTD ITSA) becoming mandatory for many in April 2026, the manual “shoebox” method of accounting is officially a crisis.
- The Pain: Manual workpapers cannot handle the quarterly reporting cycle required by HMRC. The administrative “faff” of manually aggregating four quarterly updates plus a final declaration for thousands of clients is mathematically impossible for most firms without increasing headcount.
- Impact: Firms are forced to turn away smaller clients or face severe penalties for late or inaccurate digital links, as HMRC now strictly forbids manual “copy-pasting” between spreadsheets.
4. “Version Control Hell” and Collaboration Gaps
In a manual environment, workpapers are often a fragmented mix of Excel files, Word docs, and PDF scans stored on local servers or disparate cloud folders.
- The Pain: When multiple auditors or accountants work on one file, version control breaks down. “Final_v2_USE_THIS.xlsx” becomes the norm, leading to situations where adjustments are made to outdated versions.
- Impact: This creates a review bottleneck. Partners and managers spend more time checking if the “leads” match the “backing” than they do on actual professional judgement or skepticism.
5. Stunted Advisory Growth (The Revenue Cap)
Manual workpapers anchor a firm to the billable hour for compliance, which has a natural ceiling.
- The Pain: Because it takes so long just to “get the numbers right” manually, there is zero time left for the “Advisory” conversations (cash flow forecasting, tax planning, R&D credits) that clients actually value.
- Impact: UK firms using manual processes see lower profit margins. They are stuck in a “low-fee” compliance loop while automated firms use real-time data to sell high-margin consultancy services.
Amber Anderson, former auditor and content lead at MyWorkpapers, says:
“Auditors want to see why numbers are there, down to transactional detail, without hopping between multiple systems.”